Ron Springett In The Net - Sheffield Wednesday

532 posts. < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > Show 15 30 50 60

NewBack To Top

Reesh1867

3751125169228.jpg

First used 05/08/09

Sheffield Wednesday
#1 14/11/2019 at 16:39

Consilio et Animis 

NewBack To Top

Andyben

First used 07/08/09
10012 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#2 14/11/2019 at 16:41

we's fucked 

NewBack To Top

Baresi

First used 07/08/09
10599 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#3 14/11/2019 at 16:48

Looks like it. No doubt we'll get charged - and of course because it's us, found guilty - for the 2018-19 season as well. Points deduction and L1 here we come. 

I ask you will Galway bate Mayo? Not if they have Willie Joe...they haven't a hope of beating Mayo! 

NewBack To Top

Beaconowl

IMG_0085.jpg

First used 07/08/09
8089 posts

#4 14/11/2019 at 16:49

what will be the consequence of this fucker then, if we are found guilty? 

Its now or never 

NewBack To Top

Reesh1867

3751125169228.jpg

First used 05/08/09

Sheffield Wednesday
#5 14/11/2019 at 16:50

We will get 9 points swiped now.  

Consilio et Animis 

NewBack To Top

Andyben

First used 07/08/09
10012 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#6 14/11/2019 at 16:52

They're accusing the club of dishonesty.

That's not good  

NewBack To Top

Beaconowl

IMG_0085.jpg

First used 07/08/09
8089 posts

#7 14/11/2019 at 16:52

FFS Cry

Its now or never 

NewBack To Top

holmesfield_owl

wawaw.png

First used 10/08/09
4412 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#8 14/11/2019 at 16:58

I said last week, if it looks like we could go up then that threat will be removed one way or another.

2019/20, the promotion party starts now!!!! 

NewBack To Top

Baresi

First used 07/08/09
10599 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#9 14/11/2019 at 17:00

They can do a lot more than deduct 9pts. Appreciate there's the Birmingham precedent, but they may not regard that as relevant.

From the EFL regs:

Decisions

92.1 The Disciplinary Commission may at any time make a decision, and may make more than one decision at different times on different aspects of the matters to be determined.

92.2 A decision may:

92.2.1 order a party to do or refrain from doing anything;

92.2.2 order a specific performance;

92.2.3 make a declaration on any matter to be determined;

92.2.4 issue a reprimand or warning as to the future conduct of a party;

92.2.5 order the payment of compensation to The League, any Club, any other club, Player or other person;

92.2.6 order a suspension of membership of The League;

92.2.7 order a deduction of points;

92.2.8 impose a financial penalty payable to The League;

92.2.9 recommend expulsion from membership of The League;

92.2.10 order a withdrawal or loss of benefit otherwise available to members of The League e.g. basic award or ladder payment;

92.2.11 impose an embargo on registration of Players;

92.2.12 order any other sanction as the Disciplinary Commission may think fit; and

92.2.13 order that interest be payable on any sums awarded under this Regulation for such period and at such rates as the Disciplinary Commission thinks fit.

92.3 These sanctions may be imposed immediately or may be deferred or suspended for such period and on such terms as the Disciplinary Commission shall decide.

92.4 At any time a Disciplinary Commission may determine (either of its own accord or as a result of representations from a person, Club or club and in any event in its sole discretion) that if the complaint is upheld, it may wish to exercise the power under Regulation 92.2.5 to award compensation. If the Disciplinary Commission so determines, it shall notify the parties to the proceedings and the potential recipient(s) of this fact. The Disciplinary Commission may then make appropriate directions as to the receipt of evidence of loss from the relevant recipient(s) as well as directions on the receipt of evidence in response from the parties to the proceedings.

92.5 The Disciplinary Commission shall have the power to abridge the time period set out in Regulation 94.3 (time limits for appeal) if there is a compelling reason why the appeal (if any) needs to be concluded expeditiously.

92.6 Any financial sanction and any order for costs shall be paid to The League within 14 days of the date on which the sanction or costs were imposed. Any compensation shall be paid in accordance with the order of the Disciplinary Commission. 

I ask you will Galway bate Mayo? Not if they have Willie Joe...they haven't a hope of beating Mayo! 

NewBack To Top

Reesh1867

3751125169228.jpg

First used 05/08/09

Sheffield Wednesday
#10 14/11/2019 at 17:00

They're accusing the club of dishonesty.

That's not good
Andyben, 14/11/2019 at 16:52


However the club will have sought both legal and professional accounting advice to submit the accounts including this transaction so the EFL are now accusing people who adhere to professional standards of dishonesty which is a hell of a statement. Could get bloody this.  

Consilio et Animis 

NewBack To Top

Baresi

First used 07/08/09
10599 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#11 14/11/2019 at 17:09

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/5041 8776

Beeb reporting club has stated they'll "vigorously defend" the charges. 

I ask you will Galway bate Mayo? Not if they have Willie Joe...they haven't a hope of beating Mayo! 

NewBack To Top

Reesh1867

3751125169228.jpg

First used 05/08/09

Sheffield Wednesday
#12 14/11/2019 at 17:14

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/5041 8776

Beeb reporting club has stated they'll "vigorously defend" the charges.
Baresi, 14/11/2019 at 17:09


Club made that statement on the OS 

Consilio et Animis 

NewBack To Top

Baresi

First used 07/08/09
10599 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#13 14/11/2019 at 17:22



However the club will have sought both legal and professional accounting advice to submit the accounts including this transaction so the EFL are now accusing people who adhere to professional standards of dishonesty which is a hell of a statement. Could get bloody this.
Reesh1867, 14/11/2019 at 17:00


Well let's hope DC has some bloody top notch lawyers on the case. 

I ask you will Galway bate Mayo? Not if they have Willie Joe...they haven't a hope of beating Mayo! 

NewBack To Top

Beaconowl

IMG_0085.jpg

First used 07/08/09
8089 posts

#14 14/11/2019 at 17:30

Seems every c**t has got it in for us.

I presume our accountants are just as liable as we are, in this case? As would be any lawyers involved in providing advice at the time mentioned?  

Post edited on 14/11/2019 at 17:31 by Beaconowl

Its now or never 

NewBack To Top

Andyben

First used 07/08/09
10012 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#15 14/11/2019 at 18:04

Restraint of Trade.

Fuck the EFL 

NewBack To Top

Reesh1867

3751125169228.jpg

First used 05/08/09

Sheffield Wednesday
#16 14/11/2019 at 18:13

Restraint of Trade.

Fuck the EFL
Andyben, 14/11/2019 at 18:04


That's the line I'd go for.  

Consilio et Animis 

NewBack To Top

DPCSF

image.jpeg

First used 31/05/11
12604 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#17 14/11/2019 at 18:19

Should’ve accepted it last season same as Brum, deduction of points then made fuck all difference.

There has to be some legal challenge in the way clubs aren’t allowed to spend their own money whilst clubs in the same division relegated down from the Prem can splurge 3yrs cash in one transfers window.

We also need to get a bunch of monks in to piss in corners/ goalposts, sacrifice cats or whatever it takes as the club is taking kickings from all areas, the hex is never ending, 

Be water, my friend 

NewBack To Top

Hirsty's 12th Pint

ross.jpg

First used 07/08/09
3108 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#18 14/11/2019 at 18:19

Derby will not be charged. We will be docked 12 points and ultimately relegated and then next season FFP will be abolished.

It's the Wednesday way.

Just looked and Sky Bet have us 100-1 to be relegated. May utilise my £10 free bet I have.  

NewBack To Top

Epworthowl

goldfinger1.jpg

First used 02/08/09
6480 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#19 14/11/2019 at 18:20

Lets hope we do.

The EFL think they are above the law and someone has to stand up to them...Looks like it's going to be us. 

NewBack To Top

NorthShieldsOwl

First used 13/11/09
1103 posts

#20 14/11/2019 at 18:50

Knowing our luck, EFL may introduce a new rule sanctioning the club to a limit in how much can can spend on lawyers questioning their decision 🙄. Cocks.  

NewBack To Top

tylluan

First used 09/08/09
3435 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#21 14/11/2019 at 18:53



However the club will have sought both legal and professional accounting advice to submit the accounts including this transaction so the EFL are now accusing people who adhere to professional standards of dishonesty which is a hell of a statement. Could get bloody this.
Reesh1867, 14/11/2019 at 17:00


The way I've read the EFL statement is they're saying there's a discrepancy on the ground sale date and should it have been included in the 17/18 accounts.

Is this the EFL accounting team accusing our accounting team of deliberately falsifying the books?

Reesh, MK, and any other accountant on here...
How would you be professionally reacting to this if you were the one who'd done the books or advised the club?

Would you be waiting to see what develops or straight in with a counter statement declaring an integrity slight against your company? 

Post edited on 14/11/2019 at 19:01 by tylluan

NewBack To Top

Reesh1867

3751125169228.jpg

First used 05/08/09

Sheffield Wednesday
#22 14/11/2019 at 19:02



Reesh, MK, and any other accountant on here...
How would you be professionally reacting to this if you were the one who'd done the books or advised the club?

Would you be waiting to see what develops or straight in with a counter statement declaring an integrity slight against your company?
tylluan, 14/11/2019 at 18:53


The fact the EFL signed them off to allow us to sign players suggest their trying to cover their own failings now.

I'd be livid if my professional integrity was questioned, I suspect the Auditors, who signed off the accounts, the tax professionals who advised on the sale of the stadium, the valuers and the legal counsel of the club will all be now establishing their counter arguments and picking at the EFL. 

Consilio et Animis 

NewBack To Top

Chelters

First used 16/05/19
79 posts

#23 14/11/2019 at 19:15



The way I've read the EFL statement is they're saying there's a discrepancy on the ground sale date and should it have been included in the 17/18 accounts.

Is this the EFL accounting team accusing our accounting team of deliberately falsifying the books?

Reesh, MK, and any other accountant on here...
How would you be professionally reacting to this if you were the one who'd done the books or advised the club?

Would you be waiting to see what develops or straight in with a counter statement declaring an integrity slight against your company?
tylluan, 14/11/2019 at 18:53


Well as an auditor I would be checking my PI policy to be honest.

Much as it pains me to say it, based on the information publicly available in the accounts, the inclusion of it in 2017/18 looks odd. But the auditors signed off on it so the EFL must have some info they don’t, or have the same info and interpreted it differently.

NewBack To Top

pollhammer3

sheffield-wednesday-home-football-shirt-1987-1989-s_6348_1.jpg

First used 11/08/09
1785 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#24 14/11/2019 at 19:16

Any ideas on timescale as to how this will play out?  

NewBack To Top

Greno

Sam.jpg

First used 29/04/10
13185 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#25 14/11/2019 at 19:22



The way I've read the EFL statement is they're saying there's a discrepancy on the ground sale date and should it have been included in the 17/18 accounts.

Is this the EFL accounting team accusing our accounting team of deliberately falsifying the books?

Reesh, MK, and any other accountant on here...
How would you be professionally reacting to this if you were the one who'd done the books or advised the club?

Would you be waiting to see what develops or straight in with a counter statement declaring an integrity slight against your company?
tylluan, 14/11/2019 at 18:53


The date of the contact is the date of the sale.

People are jumping on the fact that the DC company that ultimately completed the sale was formed after the end of that particular accounting period. If DC personally agreed the purchase before the accounting year end it doesn't matter which entity he's created completed it. It's called novation. 

This is the last time I'm painting on a grin. 

NewBack To Top

Reesh1867

3751125169228.jpg

First used 05/08/09

Sheffield Wednesday
#26 14/11/2019 at 19:28

Aye it isn't as though accounting rules and regulations have scope for deferred income, accrued income, contingent liabilities etc is it.

Consilio et Animis 

NewBack To Top

Greno

Sam.jpg

First used 29/04/10
13185 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#27 14/11/2019 at 19:35

Aye it isn't as though accounting rules and regulations have scope for deferred income, accrued income, contingent liabilities etc is it.

Reesh1867, 14/11/2019 at 19:28


Do accounting rules apply to the EFL in the same way that criminal law applies to the FA? Shock

This is the last time I'm painting on a grin. 

NewBack To Top

mkowl

3007906470164040_1.jpg

First used 10/08/09
21986 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#28 14/11/2019 at 19:42

We can only speculate on this and as a now ex auditor wouldn't want my audit files being poured over seeing the evidence I obtained. Hard enough justifying your opinions half the time to a friendly reviewer without a third party like the FA throwing shit around

Can only hope all said boxes are ticked

Maguire saying it's strange that the money wasn't paid straightaway, I showed him that for Derby it just went round in a circke 

Happy clapping for 4 years more than Emre 

NewBack To Top

mkowl

3007906470164040_1.jpg

First used 10/08/09
21986 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#29 14/11/2019 at 19:44



Do accounting rules apply to the EFL in the same way that criminal law applies to the FA? Shock
Greno, 14/11/2019 at 19:35


I think the Wednesday rule works

If in doubt fuck em over 

Happy clapping for 4 years more than Emre 

NewBack To Top

Reesh1867

3751125169228.jpg

First used 05/08/09

Sheffield Wednesday
#30 14/11/2019 at 19:46

We can only speculate on this and as a now ex auditor wouldn't want my audit files being poured over seeing the evidence I obtained. Hard enough justifying your opinions half the time to a friendly reviewer without a third party like the FA throwing shit around

Can only hope all said boxes are ticked

Maguire saying it's strange that the money wasn't paid straightaway, I showed him that for Derby it just went round in a circke
mkowl, 14/11/2019 at 19:42


I assume when Maguire bought his house he paid for it on the spot.....?  

Consilio et Animis 

532 posts. < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > Show 15 30 50 60

Do you want your opinion heard? Get involved with Owlsonline by emailing us at admin@owlsonline.com