Ron Springett In The Net - Sheffield Wednesday

506 posts. < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > Show 15 30 50 60

NewBack To Top

DPCSF

image.jpeg

First used 31/05/11
12591 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#46 14/11/2019 at 20:37

The most annoying of this whole bollocks is it only came in when DC rocked up with his money, when we had fuck all clubs could spend what they wanted without giving a toss. DC also had to start from scratch as the club had been under invested for a number of years, other teams just needed a top up.

Still don’t get how they can stop clubs spending whilst handing parachute money to others that dwarf what we can spend. At the end of the day DC has the money, he should be allowed to spend it, it just needs rules to stop owners loading the clubs with debt.

Be water, my friend 

NewBack To Top

Greno

Sam.jpg

First used 29/04/10
13185 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#47 14/11/2019 at 20:44

Which Auditors do we use? I presume it is not a tin pot outfit?
Beaconowl , 14/11/2019 at 20:37


BHP Ltd.

Large firm but not bent like the big 4 and Grant Thornton.

Incidentally, they were formed in 1867. 

Post edited on 14/11/2019 at 20:46 by Greno

This is the last time I'm painting on a grin. 

NewBack To Top

mkowl

3007906470164040_1.jpg

First used 10/08/09
21962 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#48 14/11/2019 at 20:58



I agree totally.

The accountants and the auditors would have been privy to the evidence you would hope. If not the EFL charge would be the thin end of a very shitty stick.
Greno, 14/11/2019 at 20:22


It is an interesting one, the EFL statement says that the disciplinary charge is subsequent to a review of documents provided by the club. My hope was that these documents would show unequivocally that the technical accounting considerations you are right about were adequately addressed.

Though be fun if the EFL start questioning the professional integrity of others. The authorities might get away with riding roughshod over players with the lower burden of proof - this is accounts there is one fucking standard and as you know interpretation / judgement is not black and white.

The accountants / auditors / lawyers / surveyors won't be rolling over and throw in the PI insurers lawyers joining in.  

Happy clapping for 4 years more than Emre 

NewBack To Top

Beaconowl

IMG_0085.jpg

First used 07/08/09
8073 posts

#49 14/11/2019 at 21:16



BHP Ltd.

Large firm but not bent like the big 4 and Grant Thornton.

Incidentally, they were formed in 1867.
Greno, 14/11/2019 at 20:44


Thanks Greno, I am not familiar with them. Do you know if they Audit other clubs? 

Its now or never 

NewBack To Top

Reesh1867

3751125169228.jpg

First used 05/08/09

Sheffield Wednesday
#50 14/11/2019 at 21:20

Doubtful, localish firm  

Consilio et Animis 

NewBack To Top

mkowl

3007906470164040_1.jpg

First used 10/08/09
21962 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#51 14/11/2019 at 21:32

Doubtful, localish firm
Reesh1867, 14/11/2019 at 21:20


Office in Leeds

Got a good client off em Bigsmile

Happy clapping for 4 years more than Emre 

NewBack To Top

Andyben

First used 07/08/09
9987 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#52 14/11/2019 at 21:36



If (big if) that speculation is true then EFL haven't got a leg to stand on.

They either have to admit they made a huge mistake or question the integrity of the auditors (dangerous ground).
Greno, 14/11/2019 at 20:34


Don't think we were fined or sanctioned by Companies House for late filing were we?

That would suggest CH was aware of the reason for the delay.

NewBack To Top

Reesh1867

3751125169228.jpg

First used 05/08/09

Sheffield Wednesday
#53 14/11/2019 at 21:37



Office in Leeds

Got a good client off em Bigsmile
mkowl, 14/11/2019 at 21:32


Chesterfield based aren't they and on Rutland Road.  

Consilio et Animis 

NewBack To Top

Andyben

First used 07/08/09
9987 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#54 14/11/2019 at 21:38

Used to look after BHP Billiton, but that were a massive mining company  

NewBack To Top

KingMong

First used 03/03/14
1887 posts

#55 14/11/2019 at 21:51

This is about the integrity of the info that has been provided, and the fact that the timings don’t align. So, it’s a question mark over the validity of the info.

It COULD be a major issue if we have messed up in this. And a lot of necks will be on the line. But, this will get dragged out anyway.

As my mate just said. Us and Derby have done the same thing, but it would be just like Wednesday to mess up the paperwork! 

NewBack To Top

mkowl

3007906470164040_1.jpg

First used 10/08/09
21962 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#56 14/11/2019 at 22:07

It is questioning basic fundamentals of how accounts are put together within the framework of accounting standards FRS 102.

It's a 60m fucking transaction so not one you just tick and move on from

So you would hope the ducks were correctly aligned in a pattern 

Happy clapping for 4 years more than Emre 

NewBack To Top

Tank_Owl

First used 09/08/15
976 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#57 14/11/2019 at 22:16

So in summary and following his goal on Saturday FF will be banned for the rest of the season, we will be docked the points we have collected so far, we will have to play behind closed doors and be under an embargo until England win the World Cup.

That's fair to any EFL leach creaming a salary off the game.

So yes we need to give EFL and SAG/ SYP/ the Council as good as they give us in as many ways as we can, which is pretty limited.😕 

Post edited on 14/11/2019 at 22:16 by Tank_Owl

NewBack To Top

mkowl

3007906470164040_1.jpg

First used 10/08/09
21962 posts

Sheffield Wednesday
#58 15/11/2019 at 06:45

So the good news is the Labour party manifesto is now fully costed and funded.

The really good news is our auditors are signing it off as true and fair NinjaThumbsup (joke alert for any lawyers out there)

Not sure I want my Mrs knowing my browsing history nevermind the Govt owning it  

Happy clapping for 4 years more than Emre 

NewBack To Top

P_O_T_R

First used 06/08/15
2955 posts

#59 15/11/2019 at 06:49

This is about the integrity of the info that has been provided, and the fact that the timings don’t align. So, it’s a question mark over the validity of the info.

It COULD be a major issue if we have messed up in this. And a lot of necks will be on the line. But, this will get dragged out anyway.

As my mate just said. Us and Derby have done the same thing, but it would be just like Wednesday to mess up the paperwork!
KingMong, 14/11/2019 at 21:51


Derby have gained Rooney out of itLaugh

NewBack To Top

MPB

bernard-righton.jpg

First used 21/07/15
5895 posts

#60 15/11/2019 at 08:34

The way that statement reads, the EFL have charged us with breaching the rule of over spending. We say we haven’t broken any rules. Our legal team says we’ll be fine and will prove that to be the case.

That little bubble permed umpah lumpah fucker’s been a right busy little snitch bitch ain’t he, he won’t stop until someone pays for his ineptitude in wasting his own failure payments. 

FUCK THE EFL!!!! 

506 posts. < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > Show 15 30 50 60

Do you want your opinion heard? Get involved with Owlsonline by emailing us at admin@owlsonline.com